Time for Perspective

Time for PerspectivePUBLIC discussion about urban renewal in Newcastle has reached an interesting point. We must consider the future of renewal in our city in a clear and rational way, considering facts and not just our personal biases.Some people opposed to the current renewal plans are using the current ICAC hearings as an excuse to stall the light rail and urban renewal projects – and want an inquiry into these decisions.Now ICAC should be free to do its work, and go where it sees fit. But there is no link established between issues raised in current hearings and decisions made by the State’s planning and transport agencies.Remember, the Newcastle rail issue has been discussed for 30 years. The former state government received a report in 2009 that recommended heavy rail truncation and installation of light rail. Decisions around the rail project have been made with careful analysis and consideration, and subject to extensive public engagement.Similarly, the UrbanGrowth/GPT project has not evolved overnight. Years of work have been put into planning and analysis of development options. The processes seem to have been conducted entirely properly, with due consideration of probity, surrounding buildings (including heritage buildings), and other impacts.Some critics of this project say the project will destroy Newcastle’s heritage. They forget that developers do the majority of heritage restoration and preservation in this city and elsewhere. Restoring heritage buildings is very expensive and difficult. And right now, many of these buildings are sitting idle and neglected.How can the worthwhile heritage buildings in the CBD be saved? By promoting redevelopment that incorporates them into facilities that people actually use.There are also people who claim they object to taller buildings in the CBD because they will destroy its history, current profile and sight lines. These people say that the mall has become vibrant without tall buildings, so why build them?It’s true; there is a wonderful excitement and vibrancy in and around the mall and that is a credit to the business people who have taken the risk and put their own money on the line to make it happen.But this city needs more than superficial renovations at street level, or a “coffee-led recovery” if we want people to live, study and work here. We need smart, sustainable renewal and real, substantial employment.